JSE: Suspend the single soybean reference point decision and conduct a transparent review

Dilekçe yönlendirildi:
The Board of Directors of JSE Limited, together with the JSE Group Chief Executive Officer and the relevant Commodities Market decision-making structures

969 imzalar

Koleksiyon tamamlandı

969 imzalar

Koleksiyon tamamlandı

  1. Başladı 03.08.2026
  2. Koleksiyon tamamlandı
  3. Gönderime hazırla
  4. Alıcı ile iletişim kutusu
  5. Karar

Dilekçe şu kişiye hitaben yazılmıştır: The Board of Directors of JSE Limited, together with the JSE Group Chief Executive Officer and the relevant Commodities Market decision-making structures

Petition to the JSE Board of Directors

We, the undersigned producers, market participants and concerned South Africans, call on the JSE to suspend the implementation of the proposed single soybean reference point and complete a transparent, evidence-based review of the soybean Multiple Reference Points model before any new methodology is implemented.

The JSE Commodity Derivatives Market plays an important role in transparent price discovery and price-risk management for the grain market in South and Southern Africa. For that reason, the soybean location-differential methodology must be trusted by all participants, including producers, processors, traders, brokers and end-users.

We recognise that the JSE must ensure that any futures-contract specification is transparent, auditable, replicable, operationally practical and consistent with its role as a licensed exchange.

However, we are concerned that the decision to discontinue the MRP model and move to a single reference point has, amongst other factors, not yet been supported by a sufficiently transparent, criterion-by-criterion public explanation against the evaluation framework established for the pilot. The pilot criteria included trading volumes and open interest, active market participation, stock build-up in zero-differential areas, redelivery of JSE silo receipts, and formal market-participant feedback.

The JSE acknowledged that trading volumes, open interest and physical deliveries improved during the pilot period, but concluded that these improvements were caused by external market conditions and not by the MRP model. Grain SA has requested disclosure of the quantitative analysis, methodology, data and weighting used to reach that conclusion. A decision with long-term implications for price discovery, producer income and market confidence should be supported by clear evidence that affected participants can understand and interrogate.

We therefore call on the JSE to:

  1. Suspend the implementation of the proposed single reference point pending a transparent review.
  2. Publish or provide to affected stakeholders the quantitative assessment used to evaluate the MRP pilot against each of the original criteria.
  3. Explain the methodology used to distinguish the effect of the MRP model from external market conditions.
  4. Reconvene the appropriate technical process with Grain SA, soybean producers, technical experts and relevant market participants before final implementation.
  5. Investigate data-governance solutions that would allow confidential, aggregated or independently verified supply, demand and crushing information to be used without disclosing commercially sensitive company-level data.
  6. Assess the regional financial impact of the proposed single reference point on producers across all soybean-producing areas before implementation.
  7. Consider a modified MRP or hybrid model that directly addresses the JSE’s concerns about transparency, replicability, auditability, simplicity and market confidence.

This petition does not ask the JSE to regulate the cash market or to grant preferential treatment to producers. The JSE has stated that its decisions are limited to the regulation of its exchange and have no force or effect in the cash market. Our request is that the JSE’s own soybean futures-contract methodology should be developed through a fair, transparent and evidence-based process that reflects physical-market realities as far as reasonably possible.

A single reference point may be simpler, but simplicity alone should not be the only test. A credible methodology should also reflect actual grain flows, regional supply and demand, delivery economics and the realities of a geographically diverse soybean industry. Grain SA has raised the concern that a single-reference-point methodology will impose deductions disconnected from physical-market realities and will create regional distortions where producers near active crushing or consumption areas are still priced against a distant national reference point.

We support a soybean price-discovery system that is transparent, credible, technically defensible, auditable, practical and fair to all market participants. By signing this petition, we support Grain SA’s call for the JSE to suspend implementation, complete the agreed evidence-based review and adopt a methodology that improves market confidence, market efficiency and long-term sustainability.

Gerekçe

This decision could have serious financial consequences for soybean producers across South Africa.
A single reference point may result in transport-related deductions being calculated mainly according to a producer’s distance from one geographic area, even where soybeans are sold, processed or consumed elsewhere. This may not reflect regional supply and demand, the actual flow of grain or the true cost of moving soybeans through the physical market.

The result could be unnecessary and unjustified costs for producers. These costs do not disappear—they affect the efficiency of the entire value chain and may ultimately influence processors, downstream industries and consumers.

Grain SA and industry experts invested substantial technical work, data and practical input into developing and testing the Multiple Reference Point model. The purpose of the model was to create a price-discovery system that more accurately reflects where grain is produced, where demand exists and how grain moves between these areas.

We are concerned that the JSE’s decision was not supported by sufficient quantitative evidence. We are also concerned that the model was not adequately assessed against the criteria that the JSE itself established beforehand for evaluating the pilot.

A decision with such significant and long-term consequences should be based on transparent evidence, proper technical evaluation and meaningful engagement with the producers who will be directly affected.

Action is required now because the JSE has proposed moving forward with a new single reference point, while Grain SA’s formal submission must be lodged by 14 August 2026. Once the system is implemented, producers may already be exposed to financial consequences that could have been avoided through a proper review.

This petition does not seek preferential treatment for producers. It calls for:

  • A fair and transparent process;
  • Clear quantitative evidence;
  • Proper consideration of the agreed evaluation criteria;
  • Meaningful producer representation; and
  • A price-discovery system that reflects actual grain movements and physical market realities.

A credible and efficient commodity market must inspire confidence among all participants. The JSE should therefore suspend the proposed implementation, reconsider the decision and adopt a system that improves market efficiency without imposing unnecessary costs on producers, consumers or the wider value chain.

Desteğiniz için çok teşekkür ederim, Grain SA, Pretoria
Başlatıcıya soru

Dilekçeyi paylaşın

Dilekçe için QR kodlu görsel

Dilekçe detayları

Dilekçe başlatıldı: 03.08.2026
Koleksiyon sona eriyor: 12.08.2026
Bölge : Güney Afrika
Konu: Tarım

Haberler

Sivil katılımı güçlendirmek için yardımcı olun. Bağımsız kalırken endişelerinizi duyurmak istiyoruz.

Şimdi Bağış yap