472 Handtekeninge
Kommentaar
I live in the area. Save the trees and wildlife.
To stop greedy developers from destroying nature
Worried about traffic flow and safety. We moved here for the peace and quiet.
I want to preserve whats left of our beautiful land. I don’t want the light pollution and noise that comes with this project. The benefit of this project does not outweigh the cost in my opinion. There has to be a better solution.
I do not want the roads in this area to become more overpopulated and dangerous than they already are. I’d like to see the rural and peaceful quality maintained.
Too much traffic, pollution, etc. we need to preserve the existing homes and wildlife.
I don’t want the extension coming out this way. We want to keep our town the way it is
Deforestation is devastation. People's right to convenience does not outweigh nature's right of existence.
Keep rural
To stop raping the land and keep this area rural.
I live in this area and travel these roads daily. I don’t think the benefits of this particular expansion outweigh the costs to our nature, land preserve, and community walking trails.
Conservation of land and animals, historical preservation
Wildlife and Greenspace are important we seem to be negatively affecting both with the boom of houses/ businesses/roadways
This will only add to the congestion of this area and provide no benefit for the people living here. We should choose to preserve the character of this area as opposed to turning it into another dense suburb.
We moved out here almost 20 years ago for the peacefulness, the nature, and less traffic. Unfortunately, greed has taken over and is causing all of us to fight to keep our way of life.
Our small rural highways do not need more traffic without support. Meaning paying to create more lanes and maintenance. We have more than enough problems with speed and traffic. There are more than enough ways to get around town. Use this money to create wider shoulders on highways D, DD, Z, F and turning lanes on highway D at 94 and visa versa.
Ill-conceived concept
A part of my community
I do not want the road cutting down more trees and I do not want a road through my back yard
To not build on this land we don't need any more houses.
We moved to the country to enjoy nature, a slower pace and some fresh air and breathing room. All the houses going up and congestion are taking away from all of this. Not to mention the light pollution added to our beautiful skies.
This area is getting too crowded for the infrastructure of a country community. The roads are already dangerous, schools are overcrowded (and understaffed), etc. Not to mention that the quiet country life we all lived here to enjoy (buying acres of property) is being snatched up for more and more houses. Our beautiful open land, wildlife and serenity are quickly disappearing.
The proposed project negatively impacts nature, habitat, watershed structure, wildlife and the existing rural housing environment. Self serving municipal and county officials are ignoring the will of the impacted constituency that will be harmed. Public hearings to date have been universally in opposition and yet the project continues to move forward. The environment and the voice of the people have to count for something.
I
It adds little benefit and causes more harm to historical, rural and residential areas.
The roads schools, emergency cannot handle the traffic this is going to create.
Also the environment you can never be restored.
Tired of losing more rural areas
Highway DD is not set up for the additional traffic and congestion this would bring to the area. Plus, safety is a major concern with the topography of the area. I have a new driver and an elderly driver in my home
To save the natural landscape that supports two bat species, Indian and African heritage areas, a colonial midden, plus many other species that use that wooded area. Deer, beaver, two spring fed creeks that are tributaries to Dardenne creek.
This roadway is not supported by any of the neighborhoods and has been opposed from day one.
To help preserve the rural areas of St Charles County from high density development.