11/22/2024, 08:37

This is a note from the openPetition editorial team:

The petition conflicted with point 1.9 of the Terms of Service and was therefore paused. The petition has now been revised, checked again by the openPetition editorial team and released.

11/21/2024, 19:39

Included more prominently that the petiton is based on personal opinions to comply with term 1.9


New petition description:

We, the undersigned, respectfully request a formal investigation into the judicial conduct of Judge Chinhayi Cadet of the San Mateo County Superior Court. This requestpetition arisesreflects frompersonal concernsopinions aboutbased heron conductobserved duringpatterns in court proceedings, which, in our opinion, raise questions about fairness, due process,proceedings and professionalpublicly behavior.Ouravailable documentation.Our concerns include:

• Potential Bias in Decision-Making: Patterns in rulings that suggest a lack of impartiality, based on observations and court transcripts.
• Possible Procedural Irregularities: Situations where adherence to due process may have been compromised, impacting the fairness of proceedings.
• Concerns About Judicial Conduct: Behaviors observed during court hearings that, in our opinion, could undermine public confidence in the judiciary's impartiality and professionalism.

The judiciary plays a critical role in upholding justice, and public trust in this institution depends on the fair and ethical conduct of its members. When concerns about judicial behavior arise, it is vital for oversight bodies to examine the issues thoroughly to ensure the integrity of our legal system.To substantiate these concerns, we are providing supporting documentation, including excerpts from court transcripts and a formal complaint submitted to the California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP). These materials are available for review at the following link to attorney Andrew Watters' article www.andrewwatters.com/hall-of-shame/chinhayi-cadet/ and my own complaint filed with the Presiding Judge Elizabeth Lee drive.google.com/file/d/1iAzYtJE0a5nSBh8TJ_7NrHIXM9XwTkIk/view?usp=sharing.

This petition reflects personal experiences, opinions and documented facts, and it is submitted in good faith. Our goal is not to disparage but to advocate for transparency and accountability in our judiciary. We believe an investigation into these matters will help restore faith in the legal process and ensure that justice is served impartially.We urge the California Commission on Judicial Performance to:

1. Review the provided evidence thoroughly.
2. Investigate the allegations of bias and procedural irregularities.
3. Take any necessary corrective action to uphold the principles of fairness and integrity in the judiciary.

By signing this petition, you support the call for judicial accountability and the preservation of trust in our legal system.

11/20/2024, 20:17

to comply with OpenPetition ters 1.4 and 1.5


New deadline: 19.09.2025
Signatures at the time of the change: 12

11/20/2024, 20:11

to comply with OpenPetition ters 1.4 and 1.5


New petition description:

We, the undersigned, expressrespectfully ourrequest deepa concernformal regardinginvestigation into the judicial conduct of Judge Chinhayi Cadet of the San Mateo County Superior Court. ItThis hasrequest comearises from concerns about her conduct during court proceedings, which, in our opinion, raise questions about fairness, due process, and professional behavior.Our concerns include:

• Potential Bias in Decision-Making: Patterns in rulings that suggest a lack of impartiality, based on observations and court transcripts.
• Possible Procedural Irregularities: Situations where adherence to due process may have been compromised, impacting the fairness of proceedings.
• Concerns About Judicial Conduct: Behaviors observed during court hearings that, in our attentionopinion, thatcould Judgeundermine Cadetpublic hasconfidence exhibitedin the judiciary's impartiality and professionalism.

The judiciary plays a critical role in upholding justice, and public trust in this institution depends on the fair and ethical conduct of its members. When concerns about judicial behavior thatarise, underminesit is vital for oversight bodies to examine the issues thoroughly to ensure the integrity of our legal system.To substantiate these concerns, we are providing supporting documentation, including excerpts from court transcripts and a formal complaint submitted to the judiciary,California including:Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP). These materials are available for review at the following link to attorney Andrew Watters' article www.andrewwatters.com/hall-of-shame/chinhayi-cadet/ and my own complaint filed with the Presiding Judge Elizabeth Lee drive.google.com/file/d/1iAzYtJE0a5nSBh8TJ_7NrHIXM9XwTkIk/view?usp=sharing.

This petition reflects personal experiences, opinions and documented facts, and it is submitted in Rulings:good Instancesfaith. whereOur decisionsgoal appearis not to favordisparage certainbut partiesto without impartial consideration of evidence.Disregardadvocate for Duetransparency Process:and Occasionsaccountability wherein proceduralour fairnessjudiciary. wasWe compromised,believe affectingan theinvestigation rightsinto ofthese individualsmatters involved.Unprofessionalwill Conduct:help Reportsrestore of behavior unbecoming of a judicial officer, eroding public trustfaith in the legal system.Theprocess judiciary'sand roleensure that justice is toserved uphold justice impartially and maintain public confidence. When a judge's actions compromise these principles, it is imperative to seek accountability.Weimpartially.We urge the California Commission on Judicial Performance toto:

1. Review thoroughlythe investigateprovided theseevidence thoroughly.
2. Investigate the allegations of bias and takeprocedural appropriateirregularities.
3. Take action,any includingnecessary corrective action to uphold the removalprinciples of Judgefairness Chinhayiand Cadetintegrity fromin herthe position,judiciary.

By tosigning restorethis faithpetition, you support the call for judicial accountability and the preservation of trust in our judiciallegal system.

11/20/2024, 11:53

This is a note from the openPetition editorial team:

This petition conflicts with item 1.4 of the Acceptable Petitions Terms of Use .

Please substantiate your statements with sources (link/URL) or mark them as your own opinion

11/20/2024, 11:53

This is a note from the openPetition editorial team:

The petition conflicted with point 1.5 of the Terms of Service and was therefore paused. The petition has now been revised, checked again by the openPetition editorial team and released.