No Bail for Louis Liebenberg

청원서는 다음 주소로 보내집니다.
Parliament of South Africa

64 서명

13 %
500는 수집 대상입니다.

64 서명

13 %
500는 수집 대상입니다.
  1. 시작됨 7월 2025
  2. 컬렉션 스틸 > 2개월
  3. 제출
  4. 수신자와의 대화
  5. 결정
개인 정보
 

본인은 제 데이터 저장 에 동의합니다. 언제든지 이 동의를 철회 할 수 있습니다.

청원서는 다음 주소로 보내주시기 바랍니다. Parliament of South Africa

We, as concerned members of a minority group in South Africa, formally express our support for the State in opposing bail for Louis Petrus Liebenberg.

Our concern stems from the fact that Liebenberg specifically targeted and solicited funds from individuals within our community, using trust, cultural affiliation, and promises of wealth to extract large-scale investments. Many of us were among the primary victims of the alleged fraudulent investment scheme currently under investigation.

We believe that granting Mr. Liebenberg bail would pose a serious threat to the safety and wellbeing of our community. His known associations with underworld criminal networks and alleged mafia contacts raise legitimate fears of witness intimidation, obstruction of justice, and further financial or physical harm to those who previously invested or testified against him.

For these reasons, we respectfully urge the court to deny his bail application in the interest of public safety, justice for the victims, and the integrity of the legal process.

이유

Risk of tampering or interference
With access to substantial resources and alleged connections, there is concern that Liebenberg could tamper with witnesses or destroy evidence.

Risk to victims and public interest
With many alleged victims still awaiting restitution, supporters argue that releasing him on bail could diminish pressure for full accountability and justice.

Consistency and fairness
Granting bail in high‑profile cases with overwhelming evidence and custodial interference risks undermining confidence in the justice system.

“Given that Louis Petrus Liebenberg is facing more than 42 serious charges of fraud, theft, money laundering, and racketeering—with alleged losses exceeding R4 billion—and considering the strong prima facie case, credible evidence of hidden assets, and concerns that he or his associates might interfere with the case or flee, granting bail would be unjustified and risky. Moreover, his repeated bail delays and lack of legal consultation in custody underline the seriousness of the situation. Courts have already rejected bail for his wife for similar reasons. For the integrity of the judicial process and protection of public trust, bail should continue to be denied.”

Tanja Liebenberg, Clanwilliam 님, 응원해주셔서 감사합니다.
개시자에게 질문

청원 공유

QR 코드가 있는 이미지

QR 코드가 있는 떼어낼 수 있는 영수증

다운로드 (PDF)

청원에 대한 정보

청원이 시작되었습니다: 2025. 07. 30.
수집 종료: 2026. 01. 29.
지역: 남아프리카 공화국
범주: 공민권

지금 이 청원을 번역하세요

새로운 언어 버전

아직 찬성 측 주장은 없습니다.

아직 CONTRA 주장은 없습니다.

사람들이 서명하는 이유

Because Liebenbergh has no remorse of what he did to other people. He might try to get out of the country as well. He is n thief

Hy en sy vrou het ons gevloek, gesteel van ons en God se naam misbruik in sy doenighede. Hy sal inmeng met getuies, vlug en iewers het hy geld waarop hy kan terugval versteek. Dis nie in belang vd publiek dat hulle borg kry nie.

청원서를 배포하기 위한 도구.

웹사이트, 블로그, 또는 웹 포털을 운영하고 계신가요? 이 청원에 적극적으로 동참해 주세요. 저희는 배너, 위젯, 그리고 이를 웹사이트에 통합할 수 있는 API(인터페이스)를 제공합니다. 도구에

지금 이 청원을 번역하세요

새로운 언어 버전

시민 참여 강화에 동참해 주세요. 우리는 독립성을 유지하면서도 여러분의 우려를 경청하고 싶습니다.

지금 홍보하세요