24. 02. 2026 10:18

Subject: Major Breakthrough at Feb 11 JID Meeting – 560+ Signatures Driving Real Change!

Good Afternoon,
Thank you for helping us surpass 560 signatures—your support is clearly shifting the conversation at the Jupiter Inlet District (JID)!

Key Takeaways from the February 11 Board Meeting

The meeting was a turning point: ~35 participants (in-person and Zoom) attended, including local captains who shared polite but direct stories about dangerous conditions and business impacts. This community turnout had a major effect.
Board members, led by Commissioner Mike Martinez and Chair George Gentile, expressed appreciation for the input and showed strong support for faster, more robust action.

Big Wins & Shifts Forward

- The most significant change (really a 180 degree shift from the prior meeting) is that the District Engineer and the board now understand that expedited permits from the Army Corp are possible. One type of expedited permit is called a Letter of Permission (LOP). In the last meeting, the engineer flatly said “No we will not qualify for a LOP as they are not issued for non-navigable inlets”. After the January meeting, we sent 4 recent examples of LOPs used for dredging non-navigable inlets and the engineers clearly did some homework prior to the Feb 11th meeting. In this meeting, the Engineer agreed and said we can request a permit and the Corp determines if an LOP is needed. That opens the door to a faster permit. LOPs can be issued in 90 days. The regular permit would take ~2 years according to the Engineer.

- The board asked for help securing support from our federal representatives to add urgency to the LOP request—we're on it.

Two Emerging Pathways

1) Preferred (faster but seasonal): Engineer completes their study by March → Submit permit application requesting LOP → Dredge SE channel with spoils placed on the beach (same location as current sand-trap dredging). Dredging could occur in fall 2026 or spring 2027 (avoiding turtle nesting season). This is far quicker than the previous 4–5-year timeline.
2) Alternative under exploration: Place spoils in the offshore dredge disposal area off Palm Beach instead of the beach. This may allow dredging during turtle nesting season, potentially accelerating the initial channel creation.

Other Progress

- The Drone-based bathymetric survey demo is scheduled for the first week of March (public welcome to observe). I'll send exact timing/details when confirmed. The goal is to lower costs significantly to enable monthly surveys and public survey updates. More info: gamma.app/docs/Drone-Based-Bathymetric-Surveying-for-Jupiter-Inlet-2vtovbybg076npx
- Latest survey (post-NE swell) shows the SE channel shifted south but remains ~7' at MLW—robust but still hazardous. You can see the survey here: www.jupiterinletdistrict.org/bathymetric-surveys#docaccess-ac72dc138820844aa0c88f3fc6a6f035c96fc83218d1fd59d36a93ee7563b513. To me, it is encouraging to see that the natural channel remains robust even during the heavy NE swell we had over the last month. It supports the theory that a dredged channel in the future may remain in place for extended periods without lots of maintenance dredging.
- District obtained FWC incident report summarizing reportable events (groundings included?).
- Jay Carpenter requested inlet cam reprogramming to better show the SE channel.
- Suggestion to contact Palm Beach Ocean Rescue to reposition their lifeguard station closer to the narrow south beach channel.

Our Core Goals remain unchanged:
- Dredge the inlet access channel to 12 feet
- Permanently mark the safe channel
- Conduct and publish monthly depth surveys

Your Role Moving Forward

This progress happened because of community voices like yours. The next regular board meeting is Wednesday, March 11 at 7:00 p.m. (same location: 400 N. Delaware Blvd., Jupiter; Zoom link on their site).
If you've experienced groundings, delays, business impacts, or safety worries—please attend (in person or Zoom) and speak during public comment. Your story carries weight.

Please forward this email to fellow boaters/fishermen.
Share the petition: www.openpetition.org/!safejupiterinlet
Plan to join March 11—your presence amplifies the message.

Together we're turning urgency into action. Thank you for staying engaged!

Best,
Chris Ball
Tequesta, FL
chrisball016@gmail.com
P.S. Petition link to share/sign: www.openpetition.org/!safejupiterinlet

10. 02. 2026 5:30

Good Morning,
Thank you for your continued support of a safer more navigable Jupiter Inlet.

Reminder: Public Board Meeting This Wednesday, February 11 at 7:00 p.m.

In person: Jupiter Inlet District office, 400 N. Delaware Blvd., Jupiter, FL 33458
Via Zoom: Link and details on the official page: www.jupiterinletdistrict.org/2026-02-11-commission-regular-board-meeting
(Contact info@jupiterinletdistrict.org or (561) 746-2223 if you need assistance joining.)

This is your opportunity to attend, listen, and speak during public comment. Even a brief statement about how inlet hazards affect your boating, business, or safety can influence the elected commissioners.

A reminder of our simple goals
- Dredge the inlet access channel to 12 feet
- Permanently mark the safe channel
- Conduct and publish monthly (or better) depth surveysQuick Reminder of Our Goals

- Update Since my last communication.
The board has approved a contract for a demo of drone-based bathymetric survey technology. This low-cost method could enable monthly surveys and real-time depth updates—major progress toward better information for everyone using the inlet.
However, the board and their engineer still lean toward a multi-year permitting process for addressing the ebb shoal and seaward channel. We've urged them to pursue faster, temporary solutions (e.g., a one-time emergency permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) to reduce immediate navigation hazards.

- In my view, after 4 months, the Current Board Sentiment is somewhat discouraging:
2 members clearly support dredging and possibly marking the inlet access.
3 members remain neutral or cautious.
At this point, none of them believe any action can be taken by the end of 2027.

These are elected officials accountable to constituents like you. If the inlet's dangers have grounded your boat, delayed your trips, hurt your business, or raised safety concerns for your family—make your voice heard at Wednesday's meeting or by emailing the board directly.

Thank you,
Chris Ball - Tequesta

18. 01. 2026 15:15

Good afternoon,
Thank you for your support in helping us collect over 500 signatures for a safer, more navigable Jupiter Inlet.

Key Takeaways from the January 14 Board Meeting of the Jupiter Inlet District.

In summary, there is progress—just slow progress. The Jupiter Inlet District (JID) is currently dredging the sand trap inside the inlet this week, but no immediate action is planned for improving navigation outside the inlet (e.g., the ebb shoal area).

Encouraging steps forward:

- The JID board requested a quote from the Districts engineer to study the effectiveness and detailed location of a southeast (SE) channel. This channel would align roughly with the existing 'natural' channel but be made a bit wider and deeper (to 12 feet). While this has been studied before, an updated study is needed for permitting. The study is estimated to take 4 months. The engineer's quote can be viewed here: drive.google.com/file/d/1u6SeLqjVG_Te1zIhc5eTtOAP_de3lrM1/view?usp=sharing

- There is continued strong interest in increasing bathymetric surveys to at least monthly, providing boaters and engineers with accurate, timely depth information. SPH Engineering (the drone-based survey company) offered their staff and equipment for free for a demo, but reimbursement for travel, processing, etc. (~$2-3k) wasn't approved in time. This technology could reduce costs by up to two-thirds and fit within the current budget. The board offered to approve this expenditure at their end of the month workshop if a contract is ready. More details here: gamma.app/docs/Drone-Based-Bathymetric-Surveying-for-Jupiter-Inlet-2vtovbybg076npx

Current Challenges
- The Board appears to need more data on the safety risks posed by the current ebb shoal conditions as they have no insight into incident rates today. Several recent incidents include multiple vessel groundings, and swimmers/surfers are now crossing the channel near the beach to reach the southern sandbar—directly in the path of boats exiting the inlet south along the beach. I've submitted a FOIA request to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and Palm Beach County Rescue for a summary of incidents over the past year to provide the Board with concrete evidence.

- There was some discussion at the meeting about the lack of urgency for addressing the ebb shoal. We requested that the Board engage the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to seek a Letter of Permission (LOP)—an expedited authorization for work beyond current permitted areas, often used for urgent navigation and safety needs. The engineer from Taylor Engineering noted that Jupiter Inlet will not not qualify due to its non-federal (non-navigable) designation. However, we know of precedents for LOPs or expedited permissions in similar non-federal or local projects, such as multiple dredging authorizations for Sebastian Inlet, Philippi Creek in Sarasota (2025), and smaller-scale work near the St. Lucie Inlet outside of federal waters (2024). We will follow up to clarify this with USACE soon.

To Restate Our Simple Goals:
- Dredge the inlet access channel to 12 feet
- Permanently mark the safe channel
- Conduct and publish monthly depth surveys

Your support is the reason this issue is now a priority for the District. Recently, only a handful of us have been attending JID board meetings. we welcome broader participation—the next meeting is February 11 at 7:00 p.m. at their office (400 N. Delaware Blvd, Jupiter). If you're a boater, concerned about safety of the inlet, have experienced incidents, or your business relies on a functional Jupiter inlet, your voice at these public meetings will make a difference.

Please forward this email, share the petition link, and ask a friend who cares about our waterways to sign the petition

Thank you again.

Best regards,
Chris Ball
Tequesta, FL
chrisball016@gmail.com
P.S. Direct link to sign/share: www.openpetition.org/!safejupiterinlet

04. 01. 2026 12:00

Thank you for your support of a Safe Jupiter Inlet! We've obtain 500+ signatures! I emailed the board members the full signatures list and the following Note today and will present hard copies on the 14th at their Monthly Board Meeting.

Dear Chair George G. Gentile, Vice-Chair Gail Whipple, Secretary/Treasurer Jim Davis, and Fellow Commissioners:

We, the undersigned residents, boaters, business owners, and concerned stakeholders of Jupiter, Tequesta, and surrounding communities, are writing to formally present the results of our recent signature drive and to urgently appeal to the Jupiter Inlet District (JID) to take decisive action to improve the safety and navigability of the Jupiter Inlet.

Over the past several months, we conducted an organic public signature campaign to gather support for JID-led efforts to dredge and maintain the ocean entrance to the Jupiter Inlet. This initiative directly aligns with the District's charter, which mandates the maintenance of the inlet including the seaward inlet access.

We are pleased to report that we have successfully collected 500+ signatures from local boaters, residents, and users of our waterways who share deep concerns about the ongoing shoaling and navigation hazards at the inlet. These signatures represent a broad cross-section of the community, including recreational boaters, fishing enthusiasts, commercial operators, and families who rely on safe access to the Atlantic for work, recreation, and economic activity. The bottom line is that this group of constituents and users of the inlet recognize that the District is spending $2-3M/yr maintaining the sand trap, but the inlet is still nearly unusable in any weather and dangerous on the average day.

Recent reports and boater experiences highlight the growing urgency and safety issues. Grounding incidents, restricted access, damaged vessels and heightened risks to passengers are weekly occurrences. These conditions not only threaten public safety but also impact local tourism, property values, and the overall vitality of our coastal community. I encourage you to read the comments in the summary attached.

The 500 signatures attached demonstrate clear and compelling public support for the JID to exercise its full authority and responsibility under its charter. We respectfully urge the Board to:

- Increase the frequency of the bathymetric surveys.
- Extend your existing dredging operation 2-500 yards to the SouthEast to include the inlet access.
- Mark the Channel.
The community has spoken clearly: while keeping in mind longer term and permanent solutions, we need URGENT action to protect lives, safeguard our waterways, and preserve the Jupiter Inlet as a vital resource for generations to come. We strongly urge you to work to obtain a Letter of Permission from the Army Corp to extend your existing dredge program to include the inlet access without taking years to obtain new permits. Do not be afraid of the Army Corp, they issue between 70-100 of these permissions each year to extend dredging permits or fix navigational safety issues.

Recent examples (2024–2025) show real benefits for nearby towns/inlets:
- Saint Lucie Inlet (Martin County, July 2024): ~25,000 cy maintenance dredging via LOP; restored safe navigation post-storm, zero groundings since, beaches nourished for free.
- Ponce de Leon Inlet (Volusia County, April 2025): ~40,000 cy removal via LOP/NWP combo; rapid post-hurricane recovery, navigation restored in weeks, $300k+ saved in emergency costs.
- Palm Beach Harbor (Palm Beach County, March 2025): ~20,000 cy maintenance via LOP; improved vessel safety, completed in ~60 days.
- Phillippi Creek (Sarasota County, 2025): Minor dredging (~10,000–15,000 cy) via NWP/LOP; enhanced access, habitat/beach benefits, zero controversy.
These precedents demonstrate that LOPs are a proven, low-risk tool for projects like the proposed Jupiter 30,000–68,000 cy dredge extension — many districts use them successfully to address hazards just like ours, often with beach nourishment as a win-win outcome. Recommend a pre-application meeting with Jacksonville District's Regulatory Branch to confirm LOP eligibility for our specific test.

Your leadership as the governing body dedicated to this mission is critical, and we stand ready to support and partner with the District in any way possible. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. We look forward to your response and to seeing meaningful progress in the near term. Please feel free to contact me at Chrisball016@gmail.com or 207-415-1331 to discuss.

Sincerely,

Christopher Ball
Petition Coordinator
On behalf of the 500+ signatories and concerned citizens of Jupiter and Tequesta

Enclosures: Summary of signature drive results (500 signatures collected); full petition list available upon request.

cc: Executive Director Joseph B. Chaison (jchaison@jupiterinletdistrict.org)

16. 12. 2025 10:30

Subject: Strong Progress at Dec 10 JID Meeting – 450+ Signatures & Growing! Let’s Hit 500 before the next board meeting

Good Morning,
Thank you for helping us obtain more than 450 signatures for a safer, more navigable Jupiter Inlet. Your support is already making a real difference!

Please keep sharing the petition with boaters, fishermen, marinas, local businesses, and friends:
www.openpetition.org/!safejupiterinlet Note: it is a two step process: first sign at this link and second, confirm your signature in your email.

A quick post, story, or forward on Instagram/Facebook goes a long way.

Key Takeaways from the December 10 Board Meeting:

The District’s Charter clearly states its responsibility “to ensure safe navigation… and to maintain the Jupiter Inlet, including its seaward approaches.” This confirms the Jupiter Inlet District board has authority over the area east of the jetty.

Encouraging steps forward:
- Dredging and marking a channel east of the jetty dominated the meeting with active board and engineering engagement — it’s now firmly on the agenda.
- Strong support to increase bathymetric surveys to at least monthly so boaters and engineers get accurate, timely depth information. A drone-based survey demo is tentatively set for January 7–9 at the inlet. This technology could cut costs by up to ⅔, allowing monthly surveys within the current budget. More details here: gamma.app/docs/Drone-Based-Bathymetric-Surveying-for-Jupiter-Inlet-2vtovbybg076npx
- District Engineer Ken Craig (Taylor Engineering) presented a preliminary scope for dredging a channel to the southeast of the jetties: 50–60k cubic yards initial dredge, 10–30k annually for maintenance — roughly half the scope of dredging the existing sand-trap inside the inlet (~100k yards/year at ~$16/yard).

Local captain Jay Carpenter shared his “Big Broom” plan including near term actions and a long term vision based on robust benchmarks from the Outer Banks that are scaled down for Jupiter. Because the district spends on average $1M in mobilization fees to dredge the Sand Trap each year, Jay floated the concept that a more robust and responsive dredging program, that includes inlet access, could be cost neutral. His presentation was well received and the board agreed to better understand how a similar program could be built here in Jupiter.
View his presentation here:
drive.google.com/file/d/16h0vbRqIkvuXrKJvCUaRFL7aFXRz3JuZ/view?usp=sharing

While progress is clear, near-term action remains limited and there was essentially no buy-in to quickly appeal to the Army Corp for a ‘Letter of Permission’ to extend the current dredging program and create the channel to the East, so continued community pressure is essential. Until we get concrete action to move sand, the inlet will remain dangerous and unusable for many.

Our simple goals:
- Dredge the inlet access channel to 12 feet
- Permanently mark the safe channel
- Conduct and publish monthly depth surveys

Your signatures are the reason this topic is now a priority. Let’s push past 500 signatures before the January meeting to show the Board, Army Corps of Engineers, and permitting agencies that the boating community is united and expects action.

Forward this email. Share the link. Tag a friend.

Thank you again,
Chris Ball
Tequesta, FL
chrisball016@gmail.com
P.S. Direct link to sign/share: www.openpetition.org/!safejupiterinlet

17. 11. 2025 8:53

Subject: Progress at Jupiter Inlet District – 350+ Signatures & Real Action! Let’s Hit 500+

Good Morning,
Thank you for standing with us to make Jupiter Inlet safe, navigable, and dependable. In just four weeks we’ve collected nearly 350 signatures — almost entirely through word-of-mouth and a handful of grassroots Instagram posts. That’s incredible momentum, and it’s already moving the needle!
Please keep sharing the petition with every boater, fisherman, marina, local business, and friend who uses the inlet:
www.openpetition.org/!pkzwg
A quick story, reel, or post on Instagram/Facebook with that link makes a huge difference.

Wins from the November 12 Board Meeting

- Dredging and marking the inlet access east of the jetty is now officially on the District’s agenda with active board and engineering engagement.
- Strong support to dramatically increase bathymetric survey frequency (at least monthly) so boaters get accurate, up-to-date depth information. We introduced the District Engineer to drone-based bathymetric surveying — a game-changing, low-cost technology he hadn’t seen before. I’m presenting the full overview to him today:
gamma.app/docs/Drone-Based-Bathymetric-Surveying-for-Jupiter-Inlet-2vtovbybg076npx

The reality check
The consulting engineer laid out a multi-year, multi-million-dollar permitting maze that made the project sound harder than sending a rocket to Mars. We pushed back: extending the existing sand-trap dredging just 200–500 yards eastward and placing the sand in the same location they already use is straightforward, proven, and affordable. One commissioner rightly raised salinity concerns for the Loxahatchee — a valid point we’ll address with data, not delay.

Concrete actions the Board directed at the meeting
-Engineer to deliver a focused feasibility study and realistic cost estimate using prior studies (no need to start from zero).
-Full technical review of drone bathymetry to slash survey costs and enable frequent, public depth updates.

Our simple, clear goals remain

- Dredge the inlet access channel to 12 feet
- Permanently mark the safe channel with buoys
- Provide monthly (or better) published depth surveys so every captain — local or visiting — knows exactly where it’s safe to run

Your voices and signatures are the reason this issue went from “not on the radar” to top priority in just a few weeks. Let’s finish strong and cross 500+ signatures before the next meeting so the Board, the Army Corps of Engineers, and every permitting agency know the boating community is united and watching.
Forward this email. Post the link. Tag a friend. Together we’ll get it done.
Thank you again — this only happens because of you.

Best regards,
Chris Ball
Tequesta, FL
chrisball016@gmail.com

11. 10. 2025 12:00

Good Morning,

Thank you for supporting our effort to make Jupiter Inlet access safe and navigable! We've gathered 66 signatures in just a few days—a strong start. To build momentum, please help us reach 500 by the November 12 board meeting. Share the petition link with fellow boaters, fishing groups, or on social media: www.openpetition.org/!pkzwg

Last Wednesday's district board meeting was encouraging. Though dredging and marking the inlet access wasn't on the agenda, each board member had received our petition. They asked Jay Carpenter to summarize our concerns and goals.

After lengthy discussion, two members now clearly support our objectives, while the others are open and requesting more details. This marks real progress: Previously, only one supported it, one opposed (absent this meeting), and three were neutral. As a result of your support, the attending members voted 4-0 to authorize the District Engineer to provide to the Board by the November Meeting an outline of the major items that will need to be studied and solutions developed to ultimately get to the goal of a Dependable Marked Inlet Approach. This outline was intended to be very broad to identify the “Major Elements” of the process.

Your involvement is already driving change! Let's push to 500 signatures to show the board and stakeholders (like the Army Corp of Engineers that have Veto power) that the community requests action for a safer, more dependable inlet.

Best,

Chris Ball
Chrisball016@gmail.com
Tequesta