Region: Norfolk

Protect Our Privacy: Demand Norfolk City Council Put Flock Camera Use to Referendum

Petition is addressed to:
Mayor Kenneth Alexander and Norfolk City Council

17 Signatures

3 %
500 for collection target

17 Signatures

3 %
500 for collection target
  1. Launched 18/08/2026
  2. Time remaining > 5 months
  3. Submission
  4. Dialog with recipient
  5. Decision
personal data
 

I agree that my data may be stored. I can revoke this consent at any time.

News

08/19/2026, 10:27

Sources were added to clearly point to evidence supporting all claims within.


New justification:

Flock Safety Inc. is a highly controversial corporation whose tools have rapidly built a web of mass surveillance used by over 4,000 cities and towns across the United States.

For Norfolk specifically, here are the facts:

1) Norfolk PD received a grant to purchase this surveillance equipment. None of our elected officials truly researched or reviewed the full capabilities of these cameras and related dashboard before their implementation.

2) Flock Safety, Inc.’s cameras feed into the most robust data compilation dashboard in history, and the cameras are not just “automated license plate readers” [ALPR]. Bumper stickers- religious, LGBT, and political ones- are all logged, as well as make, model, color, and damage on the vehicle. Facial recognition technology and microphones are already in place in these cameras, and cameras have been placed on playgrounds, hiking trails, and recreational areas where no license plates are present but minors and women are.

3) Dozens of privacy violations have already occurred with this software across the US as law enforcement officers have used the cameras to stalk and track romantic partners or even strangers, and Flock staff have themselves been caught tapping into camera feeds in recreational areas with women and children.Norfolk PD used this equipment for over four months before even writing a data policy governing its use.AI-powered cameras have also erroneously traced vehicles and people, leading to false charges against innocent people as this technology is still very imperfect in execution.(www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/flock-safety-employees-watched-kids-151737512.html)

4) Norfolk’s homicide rate is up sixty-four percent (64%) in the first half of 2026 despite the presence of these cameras. (www.wavy.com/news/local-news/norfolk/new-report-says-that-norfolks-number-of-homicides-has-increased-since-2019/)

5) Dozens of interstate, federal, and corporate alliances ensure basically any willing customer can access or purchase your data. That could be a corporation or a federal agency seeking to bypass the constitutional need for a warrant, including- as has happened in Norfolk- DHS and ICE.
There are other vendors who sell cameras without this level of data capture and sharing.

6) The cameras were purchased with a grant, but each camera requires a $2,500 annual subscription. Annual operating costs run at $430,000 with no assurances of future grant awards, leaving this financial burden to fall on our municipal budget. When the grant ends, we pay. (www.govtech.com/public-safety/norfolk-va-deploys-172-license-plate-readers)



New deadline: 02/18/2027
Signatures at the time of the change: 16


Help us to strengthen citizen participation. We want to support your petition to get the attention it deserves while remaining an independent platform.

Donate now