PG&E Mandates Transformer Room Over Active Retail on Sacramento Street Development

Petition is addressed to
PG&E, SF Planning Department

21 Signatures

4 %
500 for collection target

21 Signatures

4 %
500 for collection target
  1. Launched 28/04/2026
  2. Time remaining 8 weeks
  3. Submission
  4. Dialog with recipient
  5. Decision
personal data
 

I agree that my data may be stored. I can revoke this consent at any time.

Petition addressed to: PG&E, SF Planning Department

The project on 3637-3657 Sacramento Street was approved by the San Francisco Planning and the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection based on the understanding that a subsurface transformer would be installed. This condition was fundamental to the approved design, which was also supported through the public review process and endorsed by both the City and the surrounding neighborhood at the time of approval.
 
Since then, PG&E has denied the project sponsor's subsurface transformer request. The only alternative is to place the transformer at street level as part of the building, with a requirement for direct exterior access. This would result in approximately 14’ of continuous street frontage being dedicated to utility infrastructure.
 
This requirement has a significant and detrimental impact on the project and the surrounding neighborhood. The total street frontage is 110’, of which approximately 60% is already allocated to active retail uses. Introducing a street-level transformer would consume an additional ~20% of the frontage, replacing active, engaging uses with a blank, inactive façade.

We ask for your support in signing this petition to urge PG&E to reconsider and approve the subsurface transformer.

Reason

Such a condition would undermine the pedestrian experience, diminish the vitality of the retail corridor, and conflict with the City’s urban design goals for active ground-floor frontages. Beyond aesthetics, it effectively removes usable space that would otherwise contribute to the neighborhood’s economic and social activity. Additionally, accommodating this change would require a substantial redesign of the building envelope, and would be in direct conflict of what was previously approved by Planning.
 
Construction is well underway, with work now reaching the third floor of the structure. Revising the ground floor to accommodate a transformer room would not only have a huge cost impact but also trigger a cascade of structural redesigns and changes, unraveling progress that has already been carefully put in place, which will also delay the project completion by months.
  
Allowing above-grade utility infrastructure in a highly regarded neighborhood such as Sacramento Street would be inconsistent with its long-standing character and design standards, and could set an undesirable precedent for other similarly sensitive streetscapes across the City.
 

Thank you so much for your support, Sacramento Locust Associates, San Francisco
Question to the initiator

Petition details

Petition started: 04/28/2026
Collection ends: 07/04/2026
Region: San Francisco
Topic: Construction

Translate this petition now

new language version

Why people sign

Ew pg&e

We have opened one store at 3615 Sacramento Street and opening 2nd in a few months at 3603 Sacramento Street a few doors down from the project. We are very interested in that retail space to combine both stores. Having been in main store avenues for over 35 years and being highly involved in street scape design. The worst thing you can do is create dead space , it effects flow of traffic and the last thing a retailer wants to be next to is dead space . Consumers pick up their waking pace when there is nothing to look at and will pass the store. It also aesthetically has no value. It’s street level and utilities should not be front and center.

We need places to shop, to try things on, to touch and feel in person.

We own 3625 Sacramento St. and it is important our tenant to have an appealing sidewalk for the entire block.

The project has been approved and any party to that approval should not be changing it at this advanced point in the construction.

Tools for the spreading of the petition.

You have your own website, a blog or an entire web portal? Become an advocate and multiplier for this petition. We have the banners, widgets and API (interface) to integrate on your pages. To the tools

Translate this petition now

new language version

Help us to strengthen citizen participation. We want to support your petition to get the attention it deserves while remaining an independent platform.

Donate now