Region: Norfolk

Protect Our Privacy: Demand Norfolk City Council Put Flock Camera Use to Referendum

Petition is addressed to:
Mayor Kenneth Alexander and Norfolk City Council

17 Signatures

3 %
500 for collection target

17 Signatures

3 %
500 for collection target
  1. Launched 18/08/2026
  2. Time remaining > 5 months
  3. Submission
  4. Dialog with recipient
  5. Decision
personal data
 

I agree that my data may be stored. I can revoke this consent at any time.

Petition addressed to: Mayor Kenneth Alexander and Norfolk City Council

Flock camera use continues to be hotly debated all around the United States, and Hampton Roads is not immune. Since opinions run strong on both sides of this issue, our ask is simple: put it to a vote.
We are insisting that Norfolk City Council put the use of Flock Safety Inc surveillance cameras and their associated dashboard to a referendum and allow the residents of Norfolk, Virginia to vote on the matter.

Reason

Flock Safety Inc. is a highly controversial corporation whose tools have rapidly built a web of mass surveillance used by over 4,000 cities and towns across the United States.

For Norfolk specifically, here are the facts:

1) Norfolk PD received a grant to purchase this surveillance equipment. None of our elected officials truly researched or reviewed the full capabilities of these cameras and related dashboard before their implementation.

2) Flock Safety, Inc.’s cameras feed into the most robust data compilation dashboard in history, and the cameras are not just “automated license plate readers” [ALPR]. Bumper stickers- religious, LGBT, and political ones- are all logged, as well as make, model, color, and damage on the vehicle. Facial recognition technology and microphones are already in place in these cameras, and cameras have been placed on playgrounds, hiking trails, and recreational areas where no license plates are present but minors and women are.

3) Dozens of privacy violations have already occurred with this software across the US as law enforcement officers have used the cameras to stalk and track romantic partners or even strangers, and Flock staff have themselves been caught tapping into camera feeds in recreational areas with women and children. (https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/flock-safety-employees-watched-kids-151737512.html)

4) Norfolk’s homicide rate is up sixty-four percent (64%) in the first half of 2026 despite the presence of these cameras. (https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/norfolk/new-report-says-that-norfolks-number-of-homicides-has-increased-since-2019/)

5) Dozens of interstate, federal, and corporate alliances ensure basically any willing customer can access or purchase your data. That could be a corporation or a federal agency seeking to bypass the constitutional need for a warrant, including- as has happened in Norfolk- DHS and ICE.
There are other vendors who sell cameras without this level of data capture and sharing.

6) The cameras were purchased with a grant, but each camera requires a $2,500 annual subscription. Annual operating costs run at $430,000 with no assurances of future grant awards, leaving this financial burden to fall on our municipal budget. When the grant ends, we pay. (https://www.govtech.com/public-safety/norfolk-va-deploys-172-license-plate-readers)

Thank you so much for your support, Melissa A Corrigan, Norfolk
Question to the initiator

Petition details

Petition started: 08/18/2026
Collection ends: 02/18/2027
Region: Norfolk
Topic: Civil rights

Translate this petition now

new language version

News

  • Dear supporters,

    The petition has been revised in accordance with our terms of use. The temporary suspension has been lifted, and the petition can now be signed again.

    We thank you for your commitment!

    Your openPetition team
  • This is a note from the openPetition editorial team:

    This petition conflicts with section 1.4 of the Terms of Use for Permitted Petitions.

    Please substantiate your statements with sources (link/URL):
    "Flock staff have themselves been caught tapping into camera feeds in recreational areas with women and children."
    "Norfolk’s homicide rate is up sixty-four percent (64%) in the first half of 2026 despite the presence of these cameras."
    "The cameras were purchased with a grant, but each camera requires a $2,500 annual subscription. Annual operating costs run at $430,000 with no assurances of future grant awards, leaving this financial burden to fall on our municipal budget."

Why people sign

We want Flock/Axon, and any other AI-enabled surveillance tools, out of our community for the harm that it is unintentionally causing to innocent citizens all across the US.

It sets a dangerous precedent where we may be automatically treated as guilty suspects because of a computer error..and that error may result in the loss of our Constitutional rights, our safety and possibly even the our lives and those of our loved ones. The cons far outweigh any pros that we gain from these tools being associated with our community.

We need leadership to take firm action on this issue and protect our citizens by telling these companies to Flock Off!

I regulary go to Norfolk for pleasure and the idea of being constantly tracked by cameras makes me sick. Flock cameras are a morbid and gross violation of my and my fellow citizens' rights. There are no regulations and no standards for these surveillance systems, and should not be in public. There is rampant misuse of this system already, and it should never have made it this far. We the people should be able to vote against the invasion of our privacy. We should have a choice. And we are loudly saying No.

The usage of flock cameras in our city threatens the freedom and privacy of its people. There have been numerous instances of people being stalked or harassed using this technology across the country, with no significant data to support the idea that its use reduces or prevents crimes. These cameras are an infringement upon our rights to privacy, and their presence in Norfolk makes me feel unsafe. I do not want my taxpayer dollars funding the use of flock or any other rigorous surveillance technology of this kind. I urge the members of the council to listen to the concerns of the people and act on our behalf, as is their sworn duty.

Norfolk citizens should be the ones approving the use of these cameras, not city officials. Flock cameras raise issues of surveillance, privacy, and budgetary constraints that are not being taken into consideration at this moment, but should be.

#blockflock

Tools for the spreading of the petition.

You have your own website, a blog or an entire web portal? Become an advocate and multiplier for this petition. We have the banners, widgets and API (interface) to integrate on your pages. To the tools

Translate this petition now

new language version

Help us to strengthen citizen participation. We want to support your petition to get the attention it deserves while remaining an independent platform.

Donate now